Monday, July 1, 2013

The Continued Vitality of the Humanities Majors

Humanists have done a fair amount of teeth-gnashing over the past couple of weeks over the alleged decline in the number of humanities majors. A closer look at the data, though, suggests that the crisis is largely a fabrication based on faulty statistics. For example:

1. The changing proportion of college students majoring in the humanities is skewed by the massive increase in the proportion of college students generally (i.e., a much larger percentage of young Americans are attending college now than 40 years ago). The boom in college enrollments partly reflects a trend in various industries (most notably health care, but also law enforcement and others) to prefer or require four-year degrees for jobs that were previously done by non-college graduates. So where young people bound for such professions once skipped college, they now get pre-professional degrees, which means that the related degree programs have seen big boosts in enrollment. The much-discussed decline in the proportion of humanities majors stems at least in part from this change in the size and composition of the college-going population. The proportion of the 18-22-year-old population as a whole majoring in the humanities has remained relatively steady. For more, see Nate Silver: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/25/as-more-attend-college-majors-become-more-career-focused/?_r=2

2. Blogger Ben Schmidt has gone to the trouble of extending the degree-preference data set backwards into the 1940s, and points out that the purported starting point of the humanities' decline (ca. 1970) was actually the peak of a fairly short-lived bubble: prior to the 1960s, the proportion of humanities majors was if anything lower than it is today. For about a decade (roughly surrounding the baby boomers' arrival in college), the proportion of humanities majors surged. Then it plunged, bottoming out in the 1980s, then rebounded slightly in the 1990s, and has remained more or less steady since then. As a proportion of all college graduates, more people major in the humanities now than in the 1980s, and as a proportion of the traditional college-aged population (see above), humanities majors are more prevalent now than in either the 1980s or the 1950s. http://sappingattention.blogspot.com/2013/06/some-long-term-perspective-on-crisis-in.html

3. In two subsequent posts, Schmidt presents a convincing case that the decline in humanities majors since that peak in 1970 can be attributed entirely, or almost entirely, to the changing degree preferences of women. The proportion of male graduates majoring in the humanities has declined only slightly, but the proportion of women has plummeted. Schmidt suggests (and I agree) that this disparity undercuts arguments from David Brooks and the like that the humanities have lost popularity because of changes in the content of humanities teaching, such as the shift toward race/class/gender etc. Instead, the shift more likely reflects widening career opportunities for women. In a world where women's post-college options were limited to a few lower-status gender-typed occupations (such as teaching), and/or finding a male breadwinner to support them, female students quite understandably focused on fields more closely related to education and/or perceived cultural refinement, or eschewed four-year degree programs in favor of technical training in the female-gendered occupations like nursing or secretarial work. As previously-male-dominated professions opened up to women (and, I would add, as more female-dominated professions required four-year degrees), women spread out into a host of pre-professional majors, as well as the social sciences (the natural sciences, though, have been slower): http://sappingattention.blogspot.com/2013/06/crisis-in-humanities-or-just-women-in.html

I'm not sure that Schmidt mentions it, so I will add that the 1960s boom in humanities majors corresponds very neatly to the changing gender ratio among college students generally. Prior to World War II, the gender ratio among college graduates was roughly even, but a much lower proportion of the population attended college. That began to change with the GI bill, but male enrollments grew much more quickly: shortly after the war, male college students outnumbered females by over 2-1. The ratio began to even out a bit in the 1950s, but the big influx of women came in the 1960s and 70s. By 1980, the numbers were even again, and today of course there are significantly more women in college than men: http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/classes/econ321/orazem/goldin_college.pdf

So rather than reflecting a reaction against the supposed irrelevance or over-theorization of the humanities themselves, the apparent decline in the proportion of humanities reflects larger structural changes in both higher education and society at large. The high humanities enrollments ca. 1970 (the starting point of the supposed decline) were a short-lived bubble resulting from two factors: the limits on women's career opportunities and the influx of a higher proportion of female students with the baby boom. During the 1970s and 80s, women's career options and ergo selection of majors expanded dramatically, and a number of professions (including female-dominated professions) started to expect four-year degrees for jobs that hadn't required them before. None of these changes resulted from changes within the humanities themselves, and if anything the causal relationship went the other way: it's no coincidence that humanists began studying gender more closely in the decades after an influx of female students overturned the postwar gender imbalance on campus and entered formerly male-dominated professions. 
Now, we humanists can certainly profit from an ongoing discussion of how best to explain the value of our work for students, employers, and society at large: I'm all for that. But contrary to the media hype, students have NOT fled from the humanities in droves. The proportion of young people who major in the humanities has remained relatively steady for the last 60+ years, notwithstanding the linguistic turn, etc. etc. The supposed decline took place chiefly because American universities (and humanities majors) opened up to women a little more quickly than male-dominated professions (and the related pre-professional majors).